Soot Pollution Melting Glaciers

Soot Pollution Melting Glaciers

These glaciers are a sign of what is going into your lungs. If we 
replaced all the world's coal electric power plants with nukes we'd 
breathe cleaner air and the glaciers wouldn't lose so much ice.

    WASHINGTON – Black soot deposited on Tibetan glaciers has 
contributed significantly to the retreat of the world's largest non-
polar ice masses, according to new research by scientists from NASA 
and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Soot absorbs incoming solar 
radiation and can speed glacial melting when deposited on snow in 
sufficient quantities.

    Temperatures on the Tibetan Plateau -- sometimes called Earth's 
"third pole" -- have warmed by 0.3°C (0.5°F) per decade over the 
past 30 years, about twice the rate of observed global temperature 
increases. New field research and ongoing quantitative modeling 
suggests that soot's warming influence on Tibetan glaciers could 
rival that of greenhouse gases.

    "Tibet's glaciers are retreating at an alarming rate," said 
James Hansen, coauthor of the study and director of NASA's Goddard 
Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City. "Black soot is 
probably responsible for as much as half of the glacial melt, and 
greenhouse gases are responsible for the rest."

    "During the last 20 years, the black soot concentration has 
increased two- to three-fold relative to its concentration in 
1975," said Junji Cao, a researcher from the Chinese Academy of 
Sciences in Beijing and a coauthor of the paper.

    The study was published December 7th in the Proceedings of the 
National Academy of Sciences.

    "Fifty percent of the glaciers were retreating from 1950 to 
1980 in the Tibetan region; that rose to 95 percent in the early 
21st century," said Tandong Yao, director of the Chinese Academy's 
Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research. Some glaciers are retreating 
so quickly that they could disappear by mid-century if current 
trends continue, the researchers suggest. 

See this post over at Naked Capitalism (which includes quotes by 
James Hansen about soot pollution) about why soot pollution 
reduction should be a priority. Why not cut soot pollution ahead of 
carbon dioxide emissions. The move will certainly improve human 
health, reduce glacier melting (and therefore improve water 
supplies in the summer), and will have a cooling effect. Landscape 
darkened by soot absorbs more light and therefore heats up.

Soot in India draws more moisture and heat northward to do even 
more to melt the glaciers. Obviously India also should replace its 
coal electric plants with nuclear power plants.

    The thick soot and dust layer absorbs solar radiation, and 
heats up the air around the Himalayan foothills. The warm, rising 
air enhances the seasonal northward flow of humid monsoon winds, 
forcing moisture and hot air up the slopes of the Himalayas.

    As the aerosol particles rise on the warm, convecting air, they 
produce more rain over northern India and the Himalayan foothill, 
which further warms the atmosphere and fuels a "heat pump" that 
draws yet more warm air to the region.

    "The phenomenon changes the timing and intensity of the 
monsoon, effectively transferring heat from the low-lying lands 
over the subcontinent to the atmosphere over the Tibetan Plateau, 
which in turn warms the high-altitude land surface and hastens 
glacial retreat," Lau said. His modeling shows that aerosols -- 
particularly black carbon and dust -- likely cause as much of the 
glacial retreat in the region as greenhouse gases via this "heat 
pump" effect. 

Many rivers will be harmed by the loss of meltwater during the 
drier periods. Rising populations will of course make this problem 
much worse.

    A unique landscape plays supporting actor in the melting drama. 
The Himalayas, which dominate the plateau region, are the source of 
meltwater for many of Asia's most important rivers—the Ganges and 
Indus in India, the Brahmaputra in Bangladesh, the Salween through 
China, Thailand and Burma, the Mekong across Laos, Cambodia and 
Vietnam, and the Yellow and Yangtze rivers in China. When fossil 
fuels are burned without enough oxygen to complete combustion, one 
of the byproducts is black carbon, an aerosol that absorbs solar 
radiation (Most classes of aerosols typically reflect incoming 
sunlight, causing a cooling effect). Rising populations in Asia, 
industrial and agricultural burning, and vehicle exhaust have 
thickened concentrations of black carbon in the air.

Update: One quarter of the soot could be removed for just $15 
billion.

    But one simple measure could slow warming in some of Earth’s 
most sensitive regions, effective immediately — and it would cost 
just $15 billion.

    That’s a rough price tag for providing clean stoves to the 500 
million households that use open fires, fed by wood and animal dung 
and coal, to heat their homes and cook. 

This would improve the health of billions of people.
By Randall Parker at 2009 December 16 06:07 PM  Pollution Trends